|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
173
   |
Posted - 2016.12.02 14:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Last night night on Twitter and a shout out to CCP Karkur about leaving relic and data sites unfinished is because of junk or empty cans, the junk being carbon. This creates a false sense that a site is waiting to be hacked and upon getting to the site you find a couple cans not touched or hacked in other words.
I agree that this should stop as this causes problems especially for explorers who go out scanning down these sites only to find it uncompleted. Just because you find a site and use a cargo scanner to find the good loot doesn't give you the right to abandon the rest of the site and by not finishing the site will render a respawn from happening.
Sites in known space or wormholes to not magically disappear after you leave the unfinished site, you have to either 1) start the hack on an empty/junk can, and 2)discontinue the hack to fail it.
My corp along with our friends at Signal Cartel would really appreciate if you would just simply complete the site by failing the hacks so another new fresh site would spawn. We really appreciate it if you take the time to do this, thank you.
Admiral Graabeerd Khagan
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings. |
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
173
|
Posted - 2016.12.02 16:15:18 -
[2] - Quote
Thank you for your feedbacks, I am hoping that this will draw CCP's attention to this matter in hopes something can be done. It will take time of course but seriously the leaving of sites uncompleted does no good even if the cans have junk in them. It shouldn't even take more than a minute to fail the sites so another one can respawn in it's place. |
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
174
|
Posted - 2016.12.04 00:57:58 -
[3] - Quote
Hello again everyone,first of all thank you for being civil in this matter and keeping the discussion going. Secondly, this morning I caught the last ten minutes of the Talking in Station show with Matterall and this was mentioned that the situation has turned for the worse. Due to the fact that the thought was that the Alpha Clones were responsible for this situation. But, I don't know if this particular is true or not so I can't say
The question was asked if anybody ever found any sites in the last few days and many including myself responded with no, none, zilch. I am going to ask those of the WH community have you noticed any similar sites as well.
I am not going to sit here and accuse anyone of wrong doing, but seriously this is becoming an issue that needs to be looked at closer. I will ask that CCP Karkur to offer her ideas and thoughts as well to weigh in on the matter, and as for you the rest maybe offer other ideas as well.
Have a great weekend btw, but I will be checking this thread for any updates. 07. |
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
174
|
Posted - 2016.12.04 18:10:32 -
[4] - Quote
Again, thank you everyone for your valued inputs, opinions and thoughts. Here is another thought I had last night just for the sake of civil discussion related. The use of cargo scanners I believe should be left alone, meaning that I have no objections to it's use. I use one all the time and still clear the sites as is to respawn a new site.
My thinking that yes, it is possible that by leaving a partially completed site can produce an amount of pvp, but would defeat the purpose of exploration to a degree. I think that because explorers are a hearty lot bent on finding hidden treasures and then losing their finds so the aggressor reaps the benefits really discourages explorers.
On the other hand however I am wondering if Alphas are abusing the use of cargo scanners so that if another explorer goes only to find an incomplete site and someone else is sitting there cloaked and engage in hopes of getting the drops after podding, is it really fair for all parties involved?
I am of the opinion that this is justifiable, meaning risk and reward. We take risks in explorations in hopes of getting rewarded for the efforts put out in hoping to cash in and maybe come out ahead with a 100mil haul, maybe. Some comments about the Dronelands again I believe we should throw that into the mix as well even tho I never been there yet myself.
I don't know if we could come to a solution to this but I like to know more before I offer any solutions, or even petition a change to a small degree in the use of cargo scanners by restricting it's use to only Omegas, your thoughts ideas? |
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
174
|
Posted - 2016.12.04 18:15:54 -
[5] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Regarding cherrypicking: i've been doing every site i find in a constellation just to get others to spawn and i'm wondering if these cargo scanners used by cherrypickers are very accurate.
I've come across a few that have definitely been cherry-picked ( i know because i watched them do it while i was cloaked) and after killing the poor schmuck i hacked the cans left over just because.
A few times i've scored faction pos mods and yummy things.
Are can-scanners 100% accurate?
I would think it would be?
|
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
174
|
Posted - 2016.12.05 20:19:31 -
[6] - Quote
Once again, I want to reach out to each and everyone of you for being a part of this discussion! I will consolidate the main points and then write up a summary to close this out. Again, my thanks to all of you and I will see you in space! 07 |
|
|
| |
|